Official Da 2166 9 1 Template in PDF

When filling out and using the DA 2166-9-1 form, it is essential to understand the following key points:

• Accurate Information: Ensure that all personal and administrative data, such as name, SSN, rank, and unit information, is filled out accurately in Part I.
• Rater and Senior Rater Details: Include complete information for both the rater and senior rater, including their names, signatures, and email addresses.
• Performance Evaluation: The evaluation sections require specific comments on various attributes, such as character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement. Each section must reflect the rated NCO’s performance.
• Signature Acknowledgment: The rated NCO must understand that their signature does not imply agreement with the evaluations but confirms the accuracy of the administrative data and counseling dates.
• Appeals Process: The rated NCO should be aware of the appeals process outlined in AR 623-3, which is important for addressing any concerns regarding the evaluation.
• Overall Potential Assessment: The senior rater must select a box indicating the rated NCO’s potential compared to peers, which can impact future assignments and career progression.
• Documentation Requirements: Be mindful of any enclosures that may need to accompany the form, as indicated in Part I.

The DA 2166-9-1 form is essential for evaluating the performance of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs). Along with this form, several other documents are commonly used to ensure a comprehensive evaluation process. Below is a list of these forms and documents, each serving a specific purpose in the evaluation and reporting process.

• DA Form 4856: This form is used for counseling sessions between NCOs and their superiors. It documents discussions about performance, expectations, and areas for improvement.
• DA Form 1059: This form records the completion of Army training courses. It highlights an NCO's professional development and educational achievements.
• DA Form 670-1: The Army's uniform regulation form outlines proper wear and appearance of uniforms. It is important for maintaining professionalism within the ranks.
• DA Form 7508: This form is used to document administrative actions, such as disciplinary measures or commendations, that may affect an NCO's evaluation.
• Small Estate Affidavit: This form is essential for heirs in California to collect assets without probate; for more information, visit All California Forms.
• DA Form 2446: This document serves as a record of the NCO's promotion eligibility. It includes information about the NCO's qualifications and readiness for advancement.
• DA Form 3286: This form is utilized for documenting an NCO's special assignments and duties. It provides insight into their leadership roles and responsibilities.
• AR 623-3: This regulation provides guidance on the evaluation process for NCOs. It outlines policies and procedures that govern the completion of evaluation reports.

Each of these documents plays a vital role in the overall evaluation process, ensuring that NCOs receive fair and thorough assessments of their performance and potential. Properly completing and maintaining these forms is crucial for the professional growth of NCOs and the integrity of the evaluation system.

• DA Form 2166-9-2: This form is used for evaluating staff sergeants and is similar in structure to the DA 2166 9 1. It includes sections for administrative data, performance evaluation, and overall potential, making it a comprehensive tool for assessing NCOs.
• DA Form 67-9: This is the Officer Evaluation Report (OER) for officers. Like the DA 2166 9 1, it contains sections for administrative data, performance evaluation, and ratings by superiors, ensuring a standardized evaluation process across ranks.
• DA Form 1059: The Academic Evaluation Report (AER) is used for documenting performance in military schools. It shares similarities in its focus on performance metrics and feedback from instructors, emphasizing the importance of education in military careers.
• DA Form 4856: This form is used for counseling sessions. It parallels the DA 2166 9 1 in that it documents feedback and performance assessments, providing a framework for professional development and improvement.
• DA Form 750: The Performance Evaluation Report for civilians is akin to the DA 2166 9 1, as it assesses job performance and includes input from supervisors, ensuring consistency in evaluation across military and civilian personnel.
• DA Form 2446: This form is used for documenting the performance of enlisted soldiers in training. It resembles the DA 2166 9 1 in its focus on evaluation criteria and performance standards, crucial for career progression.
• DA Form 67-10: This form serves as the evaluation tool for warrant officers. Similar to the DA 2166 9 1, it includes administrative details, performance evaluations, and recommendations for future assignments.
• DA Form 5-1: The Enlisted Record Brief (ERB) provides a summary of an enlisted soldier's career. It is similar in that it contains essential administrative information and performance indicators, serving as a key reference for evaluations.

• Affidavit of Residency form: This legal document is essential for verifying a person's residency in Florida, often required for school enrollment or state benefits. For more details, visit All Florida Forms.

• DA Form 4100: The Noncommissioned Officer Record Brief (NCOERB) outlines an NCO's career history and performance. It shares a similar purpose with the DA 2166 9 1, focusing on documenting and assessing performance over time.
• DA Form 2166-9-3: This form evaluates master sergeants and is structured similarly to the DA 2166 9 1. It includes sections for performance evaluation and potential assessment, maintaining consistency in the evaluation process across different ranks.

1. Incorrect Personal Information: Failing to accurately fill in the name, SSN, or rank can lead to significant delays and complications.

2. Missing Dates: Not providing the correct dates for rank, submission, or counseling can result in processing issues.

3. Incomplete Duty Description: Omitting essential details in the duty description may lead to misunderstandings about the NCO's responsibilities.

4. Incorrect Email Addresses: Entering invalid email addresses for raters or the rated NCO can hinder communication.

5. Failure to Sign: Neglecting to provide signatures where required can invalidate the form.

6. Not Following Formatting Guidelines: Ignoring the required format for dates and other fields can cause confusion and errors.

7. Inaccurate APFT Information: Providing incorrect APFT results or failing to include comments for failures can lead to disputes.

8. Neglecting to Review: Failing to thoroughly review the completed form for accuracy before submission can result in overlooked mistakes.

9. Missing Enclosures: Not including the required number of enclosures can affect the completeness of the evaluation.

10. Ignoring Submission Guidelines: Not adhering to the specific instructions for submission can delay processing and evaluation.